A Universal Thread
The traffic light turns red. A jockey riding an ostrich occupies the
right lane. A cell phone rings at the
precise moment the traffic light turns green, casting mysterious implications
that the phone itself controls the light.
While at a fast gallop, the jockey tips his hat and navigates the
ostrich through traffic. Relax. It is
only a dream.
What is a dream?
Aboriginal cultures dating back over 40,000 years as well as today’s
techno-neurological community continue to assign meanings and answers to that
question (O’Merara). Simply defined, a
dream is a variation in consciousness.
Dreaming is as integral to our physiology as breathing or dying, but
what is its purpose? This paper offers
further insight into the physiology and societal themes of the dream state;
additionally, it is important to discuss the reasons why we dream at all.
Recently, the concepts of dreaming have undergone
substantial revision. The conventional
view was that dreams occur during times of sleep known as REM – a stage of sleep marked by close, tightly
clustered (beta) brain waves, lack of muscle tone, and rapid eye movements;
however, additional research and recent advances in technology confirm that
dreaming occurs at virtually all sleep phases (Cartwright 8-17) (Hobson). Modern scientific study reveals that
forebrain mechanisms control dreaming, differing from the brain mechanisms
engaged during REM sleep stages (Solms).
The steadfast view of the1950s that REM sleep somehow controls and
manifests dreaming has fallen out of scientific fashion.
All humans dream.
Study of the significance of dreams has not only traveled through
science, but religion, philosophy, mythology, and psychology as well. Many non-Western cultures accept dreams as
an external force that could contain messages from gods and spirits
(Robbins). When Aristotle proposed that
“dreams reflected a person’s bodily health”, the mythological twin brothers
Hypnos and Thanatos guided society through their respective domains of sleep
and death (O’Merara). Later, as Freud
proclaimed, “[…] dreams are the royal road to a knowledge of the unconscious
mind”, scientific society began to classify dreams as an internal force
(qtd. in Cartwright 2). Speculation on
the functions of dreaming varies as time itself.
Scientists have proposed many theories to explain the
purposes of dreaming. Freud’s model of
dreaming suggests that they serve to satisfy repressed desires by fulfilling
instinctual wishes of the subconscious mind (Cartwright 2, 80). In dreams, we can fly, enjoy sex with
anyone, or commit murder. Other
psychologists embrace Rosalind Cartwright’s theory that dreaming allows the
mind to engage in creative thinking to solve problems because dreams have absolutely
no restrictions (18-61). Both Freud and
Cartwright believe that dreams are a product of the mind, serving a function to
restore an individual’s sense of balance or competence.
However, the
explosion of technology and dream research that soon followed had the potential
to prove even the greatest thinkers wrong.
Neuroscience provides an “activation-information mode” theory
(Hobson)(Solms). This means that dreams
are simply side effects from blips and storms of errant electrical brain
activity occurring while sleeping; hence, dreams are a by-product of the
physical brain – not the mind. In this
model, dreams occur when the brain attempts to make sense of the neural
activity by constructing imagery and emotion (Hobson)(Solms). This premise does not entirely defeat
established psychological theories of dreaming since the imagery assigned after
stray neural activity (a dream) is likely to be rooted in psychological
determinants.
Despite their origins,
dreams are reflections of life experiences.
The human mind attempts to grant them purpose and meaning based on
personal and cultural surroundings.
American college students participating in a survey about the meaning of
dreams provided an interesting mirror for study. Of 123 participants, 98% believed “dreams are related to one’s
fears and anxieties”, while 88% believed “dreams attempt to work through or
solve unresolved problems” (Robbins).
Messages of fear, anxiety, and unresolved problems certainly reflected
Freud’s views of the conflicts within the conscious and subconscious mind. Dreams as problem-solvers undoubtedly
correlate with Cartwright’s theory.
Interestingly, 23% of the student participants thought dreams were
outside of natural science and could “predict the future”, or “act as conveyors
of messages from other people” (Robbins).
In the face of a technical and advanced society, beliefs about dreams
continue to share ancient meanings.
Researchers attempting to uncover the meaning and
purpose of dreaming strive to unravel the mystery. Although technology continues at incredible speeds, dreams are
self-reported distant targets in the ether that continuously move by the
second. Dreams are subjective beyond
measure. Most dreams are beyond
individual memory, extinguishing before examination. Perhaps the unidentified substance and purpose of dreams will
remain unknown.
Works
Cited
Cartwright,
Rosalind Dymond. A Primer on Sleep
and Dreaming. Menlo Park:
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1975.
Hobson,
Allan J., et al. “Dreaming and the
Brain: Toward a Cognitive
Neuroscience of Conscious States.” Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical
School. 26 Oct. 1996. 4 Jun. 2003. <http://home.earthlink.net/~sleeplab/bbs/BBS.html>.
O’ Merara,
Stephen James. “A Brief History of
Dreaming.” Odyssey 11.1 (2002): MasterFILE Premier. EBSCOhost.
MCC at Red Mountain Library, Mesa, AZ.
3 Jun. 2003.
Robbins,
Paul R., et al. “Theories of Dreams
Held by College Students.” Journal
of Social Psychology 131:1 (1991):
MasterFILE Premier. EBSCOhost. MCC at Red Mountain Library, Mesa, AZ. 3 Jun. 2003.
Solms,
Mark. “Dreaming and REM Sleep are
Controlled by Different Brain Mechanisms.”
Academic Dept. Neurosurgery, St. Bartholomew’s & Royal London School
of Medicine. 2000. 4 Jun. 2003. <http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.solms.html>.